<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing WordPress on Pair.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/</link>
	<description>Party Before Country: Today&#039;s GOP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/comment-page-1/#comment-30367</link>
		<dc:creator>eas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfun.com/?p=1037#comment-30367</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip.  I&#039;ll need to give it another look, though from my understanding of how it works, I don&#039;t understand why it would cut DB calls.
 
I &lt;a href=&quot;http://geekfun.com/2009/02/16/webfaction-beats-paircom/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;switched to a new webhost&lt;/a&gt; that uses an opcode cache and that has made a huge difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip.  I&#8217;ll need to give it another look, though from my understanding of how it works, I don&#8217;t understand why it would cut DB calls.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://geekfun.com/2009/02/16/webfaction-beats-paircom/" rel="nofollow">switched to a new webhost</a> that uses an opcode cache and that has made a huge difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The IT Juggler</title>
		<link>http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/comment-page-1/#comment-30359</link>
		<dc:creator>The IT Juggler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfun.com/?p=1037#comment-30359</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I don&#039;t know what version of PHP Speed WP, but the version I&#039;m running shaved 17% off load times, compresses the CSS and JS, and automatically moves the CSS to load first, and JS last. It has reduced the db calls. I blogged about it here - http://itjuggler.ollis.id.au/2009/02/16/wordpress-on-speedy-wp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what version of PHP Speed WP, but the version I&#8217;m running shaved 17% off load times, compresses the CSS and JS, and automatically moves the CSS to load first, and JS last. It has reduced the db calls. I blogged about it here &#8211; <a href="http://itjuggler.ollis.id.au/2009/02/16/wordpress-on-speedy-wp/" rel="nofollow">http://itjuggler.ollis.id.au/2009/02/16/wordpress-on-speedy-wp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/comment-page-1/#comment-29601</link>
		<dc:creator>eas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfun.com/?p=1037#comment-29601</guid>
		<description>Are you talking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/db-cache/&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;?  

I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/file-based-extension-to-the-wordpress-object-cache/&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this does something similar&lt;/a&gt; by creating a file based backend for the built in wordpress caching framework. It sounds like this file-based mechanism was built-in to wordpress 2.1 and removed in 2.5 because a lot of people had complaints from their shared hosting providers that it was causing excessive IO.

Assuming they are similar, it definitely makes a difference on my web host, but the query time was only 10% of so of total request processing time before, so eliminating it doesn&#039;t have a big impact on overall responsiveness.  What&#039;s really needed is something that can accelerate the startup time, particularly the loading of plugins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you talking about <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/db-cache/"  rel="nofollow">this</a>?  </p>
<p>I think <a href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/file-based-extension-to-the-wordpress-object-cache/"  rel="nofollow">this does something similar</a> by creating a file based backend for the built in wordpress caching framework. It sounds like this file-based mechanism was built-in to wordpress 2.1 and removed in 2.5 because a lot of people had complaints from their shared hosting providers that it was causing excessive IO.</p>
<p>Assuming they are similar, it definitely makes a difference on my web host, but the query time was only 10% of so of total request processing time before, so eliminating it doesn&#8217;t have a big impact on overall responsiveness.  What&#8217;s really needed is something that can accelerate the startup time, particularly the loading of plugins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poster</title>
		<link>http://geekfun.com/2008/12/15/optimizing-wordpress-on-paircom/comment-page-1/#comment-29597</link>
		<dc:creator>Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfun.com/?p=1037#comment-29597</guid>
		<description>Since yesterday we have one another great caching plugin: DB Cache</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since yesterday we have one another great caching plugin: DB Cache</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

